Breaking News · Sep 3, 2026House Rejects Amendment to Lock Supreme Court at Nine Justices

KEMETIC MINDS — BREAKING NEWS
September 03, 2026

---

The House of Representatives on Wednesday failed to advance a joint resolution championed by Republicans that would have permanently limited the U.S. Supreme Court to nine justices; the final vote was 212 in favor and 206 opposed, below the two-thirds support required for constitutional amendments ^[1].

Key Facts

• The proposed amendment would have permanently limited the Supreme Court to its current number of justices: nine ^[1].
• The final vote, mostly along party lines, was 212 in favor and 206 opposed ^[1].
• Rep. Don Davis of North Carolina was the only Democrat to vote in support of the amendment, while independent Rep. Kevin Kiley of California, who caucuses with Republicans, voted against it ^[1].
• A simple majority is needed to pass most legislation in the House, but constitutional amendments require two-thirds support ^[1].

Johnson Reacts to the Vote

Speaker Mike Johnson took to social media Wednesday to chide Democrats who voted against the measure. “For members of Congress who swore an oath to support and defend the Constitution, condemning socialism and defending the integrity of the Supreme Court shouldn’t be a controversial vote. Sadly, for today’s Democrats, they are” ^[1].

The amendment vote came a day after the House voted 220 to 192 in favor of adopting a resolution condemning socialism, with eight Democrats joining Republicans to advance that measure ^[1]. Al Jazeera reported that both efforts effectively amount to messaging exercises by Republicans seeking to put Democrats on the record as not denouncing socialism and opposing Supreme Court expansion. The maneuvers came less than two months before November’s midterm elections, which will decide which party controls the chambers of Congress ^[1].

Dispute Over Court Size

Some Democrats have called for adding justices to the nation’s highest court to counter its conservative supermajority, a process opponents call “court packing” that the article describes as controversial ^[1]. Al Jazeera reported that support for the idea gained momentum after President Donald Trump appointed three justices to the bench in his first term, and that the conservative-led court has since handed him a string of legal victories ^[1]. In April 2021, four Democrats in Congress introduced a bill that would have created a 13-justice Supreme Court, saying it “would restore balance to the nation’s highest court after four years of norm-breaking actions by Republicans” ^[1].

What’s Still Unconfirmed

All details in this report are drawn from the cited Al Jazeera article, which does not include statements from Democratic opponents of the amendment or report any further procedural next steps for the resolution ^[1].

---

References

1. Al Jazeera. (2026, September 3). US Congress rejects constitutional amendment to restrict Supreme Court size. aljazeera.com ↩a ↩b ↩c ↩d ↩e ↩f ↩g ↩h ↩i ↩j ↩k ↩l

---